Gemini Deep Think reaches officially graded IMO 2025 gold-medal standard in natural language

Unlike AlphaProof and AlphaGeometry 2 in 2024, the 2025 system consumed official problem statements directly and produced natural-language proofs without manual translation into Lean or another domain-specific formal language. It completed the task within the 4.5-hour competition limit.

What happened?

An advanced Gemini Deep Think model solved five of the six IMO 2025 problems for 35 out of 42 points, reaching gold-medal standard; Google DeepMind reported that IMO graders evaluated the natural-language solutions under the same criteria used for contestants.

Why it matters

This was a major change in interface and latency, showing that a general reasoning model could reach elite Olympiad performance end-to-end in the language used by human contestants.

Significance rationale: The result moved Olympiad-level AI from the manually formalized, multi-day AlphaProof workflow of 2024 to end-to-end natural-language proof generation within the contest time limit, with grading certified by IMO coordinators.

Historical context

Primary evidence

Evidence & status at a glance

Significance
H1 · Historical milestone
Verification
Independently corroborated
Evidence level
E2 · Research record
AI role
AI primary, human verified
Formal assurance
No formal assurance

How should these labels be read? →

Contribution & verification

Mathematical novelty
Benchmark result
Interface
Informal
AI contribution
Gemini generated the solutions end-to-end from the natural-language problems; external IMO graders assessed the submitted solutions.
Human contribution
DeepMind researchers developed and post-trained the model and supplied general problem-solving guidance; IMO coordinators and graders provided the competition problems and external scoring.
Verification
Independently corroborated · E2 · Research record · No formal assurance
Last reviewed
2026-09-11

Technical details

Systems
gemini-deep-think
Organizations
google-deepmind, international-mathematical-olympiad
Problems
international-mathematical-olympiad-2025
Methods
reasoning-model, parallel-thinking, reinforcement-learning, natural-language-proof

Sources & artifacts

Verification history

  • 2025-07-21 · Partially verified · E2 · Research record

    Google DeepMind published the score and quoted the IMO president confirming 35/42 and gold-medal standard after official grading.

  • 2026-09-10 · Independently corroborated · E2 · Research record

    The Chronicle records the result as independently corroborated at the event level: IMO coordinators graded the submission, and independent reporting confirmed the 35/42 gold-standard result and the distinction between Google's officially coordinated evaluation and OpenAI's separate evaluation. This status concerns the competition event, not a broader claim about mathematical correctness beyond the grading process.

Corrections

No corrections recorded.