What happened?
AlphaProof solved three non-geometry IMO 2024 problems and AlphaGeometry 2 solved the geometry problem. The four perfect solutions totaled 28/42 points, equivalent to the top end of the silver-medal range and one point below the gold threshold that year.
Why it matters
The result connected formal proof search with a recognizable external benchmark at medal level and became a reference point for later end-to-end natural-language olympiad systems.
Significance rationale: The combined system was reported as the first AI system to achieve medal-level performance on a full set of current IMO problems, while also exposing the practical trade-offs of manual formalization and multi-day computation.
Evidence & status at a glance
- Significance
- H1 · Historical milestone
- Verification
- Paper released
- Evidence level
- E2 · Research record
- AI role
- AI primary, human verified
- Formal assurance
- Machine-checked
How should these labels be read? →
Contribution & verification
- Mathematical novelty
- Benchmark result
- Interface
- Formal, Symbolic, Hybrid
- AI contribution
- AlphaProof searched for Lean proofs using reinforcement learning and test-time adaptation; AlphaGeometry 2 generated and checked geometry proofs in its specialized system.
- Human contribution
- Experts manually translated the contest problems into formal or specialized representations, the research teams designed and trained the systems, and mathematicians graded the resulting solutions under IMO scoring rules.
- Verification
- Paper released · E2 · Research record · Machine-checked
- Last reviewed
- 2026-09-11
Technical details
- Systems
- alphaproof, alphageometry-2
- Organizations
- google-deepmind, international-mathematical-olympiad
- Problems
- international-mathematical-olympiad-2024
- Methods
- reinforcement-learning, lean, formal-theorem-proving, neuro-symbolic-reasoning
Corrections
No corrections recorded.