MizAR 40 scales AI/ATP methods across the full Mizar Mathematical Library

The system scaled fast learned relevance methods over roughly 150,000 MML formulas and deployed them within the MizAR online reasoning service.

What happened?

The 10 October 2013 paper reported an AI/ATP system that automatically proved 40% of the theorems in the then-current Mizar Mathematical Library within 30 seconds on a 14-CPU machine.

Why it matters

The work made corpus-scale formal mathematics a practical target for integrated machine learning and automated reasoning rather than a small benchmark exercise.

Significance rationale: MizAR 40 demonstrated that a suite of learned premise-selection and ATP methods could operate at the scale of the entire Mizar Mathematical Library, turning large formal mathematics into an online AI-assisted reasoning service and corpus-wide evaluation surface.

Historical context

Earlier developments

—

Later developments

—

Related milestones

—

Primary evidence

Evidence & status at a glance

Significance
H2 · Field milestone
Verification
Paper released
Evidence level
E2 · Research record
AI role
Autonomous primary role
Formal assurance
No formal assurance

How should these labels be read? →

Contribution & verification

Mathematical novelty
Benchmark result
Interface
Formal, Symbolic
AI contribution
Learned relevance methods selected useful formulas and ATP systems attempted proofs across the library at scale.
Human contribution
Researchers engineered and optimized the learning methods, ATP portfolio, Mizar translations and online service.
Verification
Paper released · E2 · Research record · No formal assurance
Last reviewed
2026-09-15

Technical details

Systems
mizar, mizar40, mizar-online-reasoning
Organizations
university-of-innsbruck
Problems
large-theory-theorem-proving
Methods
machine-learning, premise-selection, automated-theorem-proving, large-theory-reasoning

Sources & artifacts

Verification history

  • 2013-10-10 · Paper released · E2 · Research record

    The arXiv paper establishes the system and reports the corpus-scale evaluation; Chronicle does not treat the percentage as independently reproduced.

Corrections

No corrections recorded.