MATH makes competition mathematics a standard language-model benchmark

The benchmark covered algebra, geometry, number theory, probability and other competition topics and provided full solution derivations.

What happened?

The MATH dataset introduced 12,500 challenging competition mathematics problems with step-by-step solutions for training and evaluation.

Why it matters

For several years, progress on MATH served as one of the clearest quantitative signals of LLM mathematical reasoning.

Significance rationale: MATH became a durable benchmark for measuring multi-step competition-level mathematical reasoning and later exposed saturation as reasoning models improved.

Historical context

Later developments

—

Related milestones

—

Primary evidence

Evidence & status at a glance

Significance
H2 · Field milestone
Verification
Paper released
Evidence level
E3 · Inspectable artifact
AI role
Computation only
Formal assurance
Artifact available

How should these labels be read? →

Contribution & verification

Mathematical novelty
Tooling only
Interface
Informal, Symbolic
AI contribution
AI systems are evaluated and trained on the benchmark; the benchmark itself is a human-curated research artifact.
Human contribution
Researchers collected problems and solutions, designed the dataset and evaluated scaling behavior.
Verification
Paper released · E3 · Inspectable artifact · Artifact available
Last reviewed
2026-09-15

Technical details

Systems
math-benchmark
Organizations
uc-berkeley
Problems
competition-mathematics
Methods
benchmarking, dataset-curation

Sources & artifacts

Verification history

  • 2021-03-05 · Paper released · E2 · Research record

    The Chronicle records this event from the cited primary or official source; the status does not imply independent Chronicle verification.

  • 2026-09-11 · Paper released · E3 · Inspectable artifact

    This corpus refresh added a directly inspectable public artifact maintained by the authors or releasing organization. E3 records artifact-level inspectability and does not imply independent verification of the underlying scientific or mathematical claim.

Corrections

No corrections recorded.