Buckmaster and Alpöge release AI-assisted smooth-forcing blowup results for Euler, Boussinesq and IPM

The researchers explicitly credit Diego Córdoba and Luis Martínez-Zoroa for the underlying forced-blowup research program and describe using LLMs to push that program from rougher forcing toward smooth forcing and related fluid equations.

What happened?

Tristan Buckmaster and Levent Alpöge report finite-time blowup results with smooth forcing for the three-dimensional incompressible Euler equations, the planar inviscid Boussinesq equations and incompressible porous media, developed with substantial help from Claude and Codex; public Lean artifacts formalize the Euler and Boussinesq results.

The researchers explicitly credit Diego Córdoba and Luis Martínez-Zoroa for the underlying forced-blowup research program and describe using LLMs to push that program from rougher forcing toward smooth forcing and related fluid equations. The public `fluid_lean` repository contains complete Lean developments for the Euler and Boussinesq theorems, with its documentation attributing the Lean code to Claude under Alpöge's direction.

Why it matters

The event is an unusually inspectable example of AI contributing substantively to frontier mathematical research while humans retain the research program, judgment and responsibility for the claims. The results also became immediate historical context for the contemporaneous OpenAI Navier–Stokes claim, making precise attribution and separation of the distinct mathematical statements important to the Chronicle.

Significance rationale: The release combines three new smooth-forcing blowup results in major fluid equations with documented substantive LLM-assisted proof development and public Lean formalizations for the Euler and Boussinesq results. If accepted as H1, its historical significance comes from demonstrating human-led AI collaboration on frontier mathematical research, not from an AI originating the underlying research program.

Historical context

Primary evidence

Evidence & status at a glance

Significance
H1 · Historical milestone
Verification
Partially verified
Evidence level
E3 · Inspectable artifact
AI role
Human–AI collaboration
Formal assurance
Artifact available

How should these labels be read? →

Contribution & verification

Mathematical novelty
New result
Interface
Informal, Formal, Symbolic, Hybrid
AI contribution
Buckmaster's public account describes Claude and Codex as being used throughout the project with substantial help from LLMs in extending the existing program. The public Euler and Boussinesq Lean repositories state that all Lean code, including the trusted statement files, was written by Claude under Alpöge's direction. The authors explicitly state that the underlying research program was not originated by an LLM.
Human contribution
Buckmaster and Alpöge selected and developed the research direction, evaluated and organized the mathematical arguments, authored the released manuscripts and remained responsible for the claims. They credit Córdoba and Martínez-Zoroa with the foundational forced-blowup program; Alpöge directed and reviewed the public Lean formalization workflow.
Verification
Partially verified · E3 · Inspectable artifact · Artifact available
Last reviewed
2026-09-11

Technical details

Systems
claude, codex, lean, mathlib
Organizations
—
Problems
forced-euler-blowup, forced-boussinesq-blowup, forced-ipm-blowup
Methods
human-ai-collaboration, proof-development, formal-theorem-proving, lean

Sources & artifacts

Verification history

  • 2026-09-08 · Paper released · E3 · Inspectable artifact

    Three manuscripts and a public Lean repository were released. The repository contains dedicated formalization projects for Euler and Boussinesq, while no corresponding IPM Lean project is present in the public repository tree.

  • 2026-09-11 · Partially verified · E3 · Inspectable artifact

    Terence Tao independently discussed the mathematical work and its relationship to the Córdoba–Martínez-Zoroa program, and OpenAI independently acknowledged Buckmaster and Alpöge's priority on the forced Euler result. These sources corroborate the event and its historical context but are not treated here as independent verification of all three underlying theorems or as an independent replay of the Lean artifacts.

Corrections

No corrections recorded.